13Jan/120

Now that’s a super-injunction: Sketches by Queen Victoria that she didn’t want seen revealed after 150 years

They were intimate pictures she never wanted the public to see.

So when Queen Victoria’s family portraits – sketched by herself – were leaked to a journalist, she sought an injunction.

In one of the first cases of its kind, the furious monarch applied to the courts to stop publication of the drawings in the 1840s. Now, more than 150 years later, the public will be offered the rare chance to see them when copies of six of the pictures go to auction.

They were shrouded in secrecy for most of Victoria’s life and only trusted friends and family were allowed to own copies.

Her injunction was one of the earliest examples of high-profile figures turning to the courts to prevent reporting on their private lives – a facility now popular with philandering celebrities.

The etchings are expected to make up to £1,500 when they are sold at Dominic Winter Book Auctions in Cirencester on January 25.

Chris Albury, senior catalogue auctioneer, said: ‘This is one of the earliest examples of high-profile figures taking injunctions out against the Press. The sketches were for Queen Victoria’s own amusement, and not meant for circulation among the public.

‘She felt her life had been infringed upon. The sketches are very casual and the figures are not posed. It offers an insight into their lives. The public wouldn’t have known what they looked like behind the scenes.’

The six etchings include sketches of her children taking a bath, playing with their pets and being tended by their nurse.

One shows her eldest daughter, Victoria, the Princess Royal as a baby crawling along the floor clutching a toy. Each portrait is accompanied with a caption written by the Queen.

She wrote ‘Before going to Bed’ underneath a sketch of her three children enjoying bath time.

The injunction was taken out after the images were leaked to royal gossip columnist Jasper Tomsett Judge, who hoped to produce a catalogue of the Royal Family’s most intimate moments.

He bought them for £5 from an apprentice to the Queen’s printer, who had been trusted with making copies for Victoria’s friends and family.

In the 1840s, the Queen produced 62 such drawings, which she then made into etchings so they could be reproduced for her friends and family. The injunction lasted for most of the Queen’s lifetime until it was decided the original prints should become part of the Royal Collection.

The owner of the etchings up for sale, who remains anonymous, found them in a box in the family attic and had no idea of their importance until they consulted experts.

Source: Daily Mail

UK Auctioneers

Filed under: Antiques News No Comments
11Jan/120

Lectern stolen from village church turns up in Romania

An ornate brass lectern stolen from a church in Wiltshire has been found at an antiques fair in Romania.

The discovery suggests Eastern European gangs are plundering our churches and smuggling treasures abroad to sell cheaply.

The 4ft eagle lectern, worth about £2,000, was looted from Holy Cross Church in the village of Ashton Keynes, near Cirencester, in September.

Memorable: These plaques which were stolen have now been recovered after diligent staff in a Manchester cemetery memorial garden refused to buy them and told police

For months its disappearance was a mystery, not least of which was how the thieves managed to remove the heavy artefact.

But then police received an email from a man who had seen a plaque engraved on the lectern and searched the internet to discover it was stolen.

PC Steve Harvey said: 'I thought it was a scam email but it had a mobile number on it. So I called the person, who didn't speak very good English, and he said he'd seen this unusual piece in a village in Romania and he noticed the Ashton Keynes engraving.

'We're now working with Interpol and I'm reasonably confident it will be returned.'

Gaye Horrell, treasurer at Holy Cross, revealed the church had feared it would have been melted down. She had no idea how the theft had happened, adding: 'It was too heavy to move around and the church is locked at night so it must have been dragged out in broad daylight.'

Last week, a scrap metal dealer was branded 'beyond contempt' after trying to sell bronze plaques ripped from a cemetery memorial garden.

Sean McNab, 44, is facing jail after he admitted handling ten memorial plaques stolen from the Garden of Remembrance at Blackley Cemetery, Manchester, in November.

9Jan/120

A penny saved: One cent coin minted in 1793 sells more $1.4M

A once-cent copper coin from the earliest days of the US Mint in 1793 has sold for a record $1.38 million at a Florida auction.

James Halperin of Texas-based Heritage Auctions told The Associated Press on Saturday that the sale was 'the most a United States copper coin has ever sold for at auction.'

The coin was made at the Mint in Philadelphia in 1793, the first year that the US made its own coins.

Heritage officials said in a news release that the name of the buyer was not revealed but that he was 'a major collector.' One of the coin's earliest owners was a well-known Baltimore banker, Louis E. Eliasberg, Sr.

'Mr. Eliasberg was nicknamed, "the king of coins" because before his death in 1976 he assembled a collection that consisted of at least one example of every coin ever made at the United States Mint, a feat never duplicated,' Halperin said in the news release.

The final bid for the coin last week was one of the largest sales at the Florida United Numismatists coin show and annual convention, which runs through Sunday.

Mr Halperin said a five-dollar gold piece from 1829 also was sold.

Mr Halperin said there remain a few hundred 1793 coins in different condition, but that the one auctioned off Wednesday night is rare because it wasn't in circulation.

Most valuable: While 1.4 million for a penny is remarkable, it's not nearly as valuable as the 1933 Double Eagle gold coin. One sold for $7.6 million

Officials say it shows no wear on its lettering, its Lady Liberty face or the chain of linking rings on its back.

The news release said the coin is known as a 'Chain Cent' because its chain of linking rings was supposed to represent the solidarity of the states.

The design was changed to a wreath after some critics claimed it was symbolic of slavery.

Mr Halperin said the auction had more than $64 million in transactions. The show runs through Sunday. 

While impressive, the 1793 Chain Cent's selling price is nowhere near the record among American coins.

That honor belongs to the 1933 'Double Eagle,' the only legal copy of a coin that never made it into circulation. It sold at a 2002 auction for $7.59 million.

The previous record belonged to an 1804 silver dollar that was bought in 1999 for $4.14 million.

Source: Daily Mail
6Jan/120

David Lay Chinese porcelain beats auction estimate 40 times over

Worth £25,000

The value of a Chinese porcelain at David Lay's recent auction in Cornwall, UK took everyone by surprise, especially its consignor.

"She was having a home hairdo at the time," Mr Lay explained to the BBC.

"I had to hang on until I could talk to her, but of course she was very pleased."

The 18th century porcelain in question was a damaged and incomplete altarpiece in the form of a Tibetan stupa structure, which had appeared at the December auction with a high-end estimate of £600.

The item sold for £25,000 to a London-based dealer, with a bevy of bidders from China pushing the price far beyond expectations.

"To my right was a computer screen and I could see these Chinese bidders fighting away and the price soaring," said Lay.

"Nine times out of 10 we come pretty close with our price estimates, but I am delighted to confess that we got this one spectacularly wrong."

Its previous owner had employed the 22cm-high piece as a table lamp.

The sale is a reminder of the strong value of Chinese artefacts at the moment.

The growing prosperity of China is a key factor in the buoyancy of the market.

There are more than 960,000 millionaires in the country, with numbers up 9.7% in 2010 compared with the previous year, according to data from the Hurun Research Institute.

It is no wonder that among the growing numbers of millionaires exist aspirational collectors keen to repatriate their country's rich artistic heritage.

Source : Paul Fraser Collectables

UK Auctioneers

4Jan/120

Out of tune: Concert violinists can’t identify the sound of a multi-million-pound Stradivarius

Discord: A 1718 violin by Antonio Stradivari, 'Maurin'. Stradivaris are considered the best instruments of their kind in the worldThe Stradivarius is thought to be one of the most beautiful musical instruments ever made.

Top violinists have paid millions of pounds to get their hands on the 300-year-old fiddle.

But it has now emerged that musicians cannot tell the difference between that and a modern violin.

Claudia Fritz, a researcher at the University of Paris, tested 21 virtuoso performers at an international competition in Indiannapolis.

She found they did not prefer the old violins when playing three modern ones and three made by Italian maestros in darkness, The Guardian reported.

One of the antique instruments was made by Guarneri del Gesu around 1740, and two in Antonio Stradivari's workshop around 1700.

Ms Fritz dimmed the lights and passed the violins in random order to the musicians, who had to wear welders' goggles and stand behind a dividing curtain.

Each had to rank the instruments according to their playability, projection, response and quality of sound.

The violinists mostly preferred new instruments, and overall they were least keen on one of the two Stradivaris. They also could not tell whether their favourite violin was old or new.

'The old versus new issue doesn't make any sense,' said Ms Fritz. 'They are beautiful instruments, but the prices are insane.

'It doesn't matter if the violin's old or new, all that matters is whether it's a good violin or a bad violin.'

The researchers could find no link between the age and value of the violins and how they were rated by the violinists.

The three old instruments had a combined value of $10million - a hundred times that of the modern violins.

Ms Fritz describes her findings as a 'striking challenge to conventional wisdom' in her report published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

She said it showed that modern violin makers were doing a great job.

Musical genius: British violinist Tasmin Little plays a Stradivarius that was up for auction for £940,000 at Christie's in 2000

The players were not completely blinded  because that would interfere with their perception too much. With goggles on, they could only see an instrument's outline.

To mask any telltale aroma from the old instruments, the chin rest on each was dabbed with perfume.

One shortcoming of the study was that the violinists were asked to rate a particular instrument's projection - how well its sound travels - themselves, said the newspaper. Another was that only a few violins were tested.

But the researchers said that the latter was unavoidable, because owners of fragile, valuable old violins were reluctant to hand them over to scientists and 'blindfolded strangers'.

Kai-Thomas Roth, secretary of the British Violin Making Association, said double blind tests, where neither experimenter nor musician knows which violin is played, had already shown people cannot distinguish a modern violin from an expensive masterpiece.

He said older instruments were helped by some myth-making, as musicians would work harder with a Stradivari, rather than just blaming their tools for any difficulties.

Antonio Stradivari, 1644 to 1737, is credited with devising the proportions of the modern violin, thus giving it a more powerful and rounded sound. About 650 of his violins, violas, and violoncellos are still in existence.

Source : Daily Mail

UK Auctioneers

23Dec/111

Curse of the Qianlong vase: The £500,000 antique which sparked a family feud and court battle…

...and left the seller facing financial ruin

Q: What could possibly go wrong when your bric-a-brac pot goes under the hammer for an eye-watering sum?

A: Your former mother-in-law decides it's hers ...

At just 5in tall, the gilt-copper Chinese vase is one of the less imposing exhibits at the New York gallery. With its brightly coloured enamelling and exotic design featuring a bear with a bird of prey perching on its head, it is certainly eye-catching. But its price-tag of £500,000 might seem somewhat steep to those lacking in-depth knowledge of Chinese objets d’art.

For the experts, though, the little ornament’s fascinating history makes it worth every penny of its asking price. Commissioned by the Chinese Qianlong Emperor, who ruled from 1735 to 1796, it was later looted from the Summer Palace in Beijing during the Second Opium War in 1860.

All that makes it of great interest to collectors keen to capitalise on the current boom in Chinese antiques. Yet there is one extraordinary period of the vase’s past in Britain that is nowhere to be found in its description in the gallery’s catalogue

For the past two years, it has been at the centre of a family rift so acrimonious it resulted in a lengthy and bitter court battle over its ownership, which was finally decided last month.

The case first made headlines when Andrea Calland, a mother of three from Ruthin, North Wales, sold the ornament at an auction in Chester in 2009. To her surprise, it was bought for £228,000 by a leading Oriental art dealer, who whisked it off to be displayed in New York.

But what happened next should serve as a warning to anyone wondering if there could  be gold among the rubbish in the attic – be  absolutely sure of its provenance.

Her only asset is her beloved home, a pink stone cottage in Ruthin, a  picturesque market town, and she fears she will have to sell up.

Speaking publicly for the first time, Andrea says: ‘I wish I’d never laid eyes on that vase. It’s caused such unbelievable pain, not just for me  but also my girls, Sophie  and Phoebe, who have been caught in the middle of a  horrible situation.

‘The court case was one of the worst experiences of my life. It was so hurtful to be attacked by people I used to love. At one point, I was  sobbing so much I had to get up and leave the court.

‘Now I’m terrified. I’ve been told to increase the mortgage on the house to raise the funds but I don’t think I can because I’m self-employed. My house isn’t just my home, it’s the girls’ home, too.

‘Who would have thought that a person could lose their home as a result of selling  a bit of bric-a-brac they’ve had lying around for years?’

The origins of this sorry saga can be traced back years before Andrea’s decision to sell the vase – to the unhappy ending of her relationship with Mrs Galloway’s son, Steven.

Andrea was 23 when the pair met in 1990 and a single mother to a son, Oliver, by her childhood sweetheart Rick, with whom she has remained close friends. Steven, six years older and working for his father’s insurance brokerage, seemed to offer the stability she craved.

As their relationship progressed, Andrea became pregnant with their first child, Sophie, and moved into Steven’s apartment with Oliver. It was during this period that Mrs Galloway claims she lent her son the vase, which she says she regarded as a family heirloom. Andrea says she has no  recollection of it ever being there.

She first remembers seeing it when the family moved to a spacious farmhouse, rented from a local couple. ‘I know the vase was in that house because I remember it being on a shelf by a door, where the kids could have knocked it over at any time,’ she says.

‘In court, Steven said it was explained to me from the beginning that it was only on loan from his mother and that it was valuable.

‘But I used to burn incense in it and nobody ever asked me to treat it in any special way. When we moved again, to another farmhouse, it was in the children’s playroom. I didn’t even think about where it came from because I’d accumulated so much since I left home at 16.

'Look at my house – I’m a clutterbug and I couldn’t tell you where half these things have come from.’

Indeed, the walls of Andrea’s cottage are covered in shelves groaning under the weight of matching cup and saucer sets, little coloured glasses, lamps and, yes, vases. It is not hard to imagine how she could have assumed the Chinese vase was just another trinket she had picked up.

In 1997, she and Steven had another daughter, Phoebe, but their relationship was starting to deteriorate. Gradually, Andrea claims, she noticed that bills were not always being paid on time. In 2001, Steven admitted the brokerage was in trouble.

‘I’d encouraged all my friends and family to use the brokerage and I  had no idea it was in so much debt,’  Andrea says. ‘The company was officially declared bankrupt in 2002 and it was an horrendous time.

‘We moved into my cottage, which I’d owned since before we met and previously rented out, and I was working around the clock in four jobs,  trying to make ends meet. I wanted us  to work through the problems as a family but I didn’t feel he was trying. It was clear the relationship was over.’

Steven moved in with his parents, Evelyn and Jack, while Andrea tried to rebuild her life with her children in the cottage, where the Chinese vase lay forgotten in a box under the stairs. For the next few years, Steven and the Galloways maintained contact with Sophie and Phoebe but Andrea’s own relationship with the family was strained.

In 2008, Andrea decided to sell some of her old junk. ‘I had been through a difficult time and I decided to redecorate and declutter to make a fresh start,’ she says. ‘Phoebe’s birthday was approaching and  I wanted to buy her a laptop to help her with her work.

‘I grabbed a few bits and pieces from under the stairs, including the vase and some old coins I’d had since my childhood, and took them to an antique shop to get them valued.

‘The owner told me he’d give me £375 for the vase but he wanted me to leave the coins overnight to be valued, which I didn’t want to do.

‘In the end, I decided to take them to an auction house, Byrne’s in Chester. They told me they would put a reserve of £80 on the vase, but when I told them about the antique dealer’s offer, they upped it to £500. I thought,

“Wow, hopefully I’ll have enough for Phoebe’s laptop.” Now I wish to God I’d sold it to the antique dealer.’

A couple of days later, Byrne’s called Andrea to inform her that the vase had fetched almost £230,000.

Then she received a call from the police. Having seen the story, Mrs Galloway had not only informed Byrne’s that the vase was hers, she had also reported it to the police as a theft.

‘I didn’t even have a chance to think about the money,’ says Andrea. ‘The next thing I knew, I was defending myself to the police, who didn’t take any further action.

‘When I heard what Evelyn was saying – that I knew full well the vase was a loan and that she’d tried to get it back on numerous occasions – I felt very sad. I couldn’t believe it.’

On the advice of the auction house, Andrea found a solicitor. From the outset, she and her lawyer attempted to settle the matter without going to court. ‘I wanted all the money to be put into trust for the girls, or for us to split it 50/50, but we couldn’t reach an agreement,’ she says.

While Andrea had to pay her own legal costs, pensioner Evelyn received legal aid, which Andrea feels is unfair. In court, Mrs Galloway was able to produce the original catalogue from when her father bought the vase at a sale in Birkenhead, Merseyside, in 1956. In her witness statement, she described Andrea as being emotionally unstable and highly obstructive about the vase.

The law states that if six years pass without an attempt to reclaim an item from somebody, that item becomes theirs. Mrs Galloway said she had repeatedly asked for the vase to be returned since Andrea’s split with her son, but that Andrea had responded by hanging up the phone or slamming the door in her face.

‘I felt utterly betrayed,’ says Andrea. ‘I used to get on well with Evelyn. In fact, I loved her, and hearing her mud-slinging was devastating. If she’d had her way, I would be in prison now – the mother of her grandchildren.

'There was no written proof that she had tried to reclaim the vase. She had never written to me or got a solicitor involved. She hadn’t even insured it.’

Judge Llewellyn ruled that the vase had not been abandoned by Mrs Galloway and that she still retained ownership. He stated that while it had been at Andrea’s home for almost two decades, she had not given enough thought to its origins.

He added that he appreciated the ruling was a ‘disaster’ for Andrea, ‘who thought that the sun had shined on her life for once’.

Following the ruling, Mrs Galloway said: ‘The whole thing has been appalling. It has taken us two years to get to this stage. We could not stand by and let Andrea walk away with all that money. It is an awful lot and we had no idea the vase was worth that amount.’

Meanwhile, Andrea is trying to focus on minimising the impact on Sophie, now 19, and Phoebe, 14.  Oliver, 25, is now a doctor. ‘They’ve been trying to stay out of it but obviously that’s been very difficult,’ she says.

‘I just feel so sad for them. It doesn’t seem right that while their grandmother has all this money, their mother is facing ruin. All selling that vase did was make their lives harder – that’s what I regret.’

Last night, Steven Galloway told The Mail on Sunday: ‘My primary concern is for preserving the dignity of my two children as much as possible, so all I will say is that my mother and I are relieved the case is over, but we take no pleasure in any of this.’

Source: Daily Mail

 

21Dec/110

Six-thousand-year-old earth mother statuette found on banks of the Somme…

Six-thousand-year-old earth mother statuette found on banks of the Somme is named 'Lady of Villers-Carbonnel'

With a curvaceous figure and short stubby arms, the discovery of a 6,000-year-old earth mother in France shows how far the essence of beauty has changed over the centuries.

The unearthing of the extremely rare statue in Northern France has been given the rather grand title of ‘Lady of Villers-Carbonnel’ and is thought to be connected to a cult who worshipped a specific fertility goddess.

Immaculately preserved the 8 inch statue was made from local earth or clay and closely resembles figurines found across the Mediterranean.

It is unusual for a find to found so far north, experts told The Independent.

And it is because the figure was discovered broken in five or six parts while she was being fired, sometime between 4300 and 3600 BC, which has kept her so well preserved.

She was found in the ruins of a neolithic kiln on a dig near Villers-Carbonnell on the banks of the River Somme.

Archaeologist in charge of the dig, Francoise Bostyn, told The Independent the find could be one of many.

She said: ‘The statuette is very beautiful and remarkably preserved.

‘We sometimes find fragments of such statuettes but rarely the whole figure.’

She added the figure of the statue was very similar to figures found as far away as the Middle East from the same period.

The dig became possible after the French government ‘preventative archaeology agency, Inrap, gave permission and money to explore 77 sites along the 60-mile course of the new 50m wide Seine-Nord Europe canal.

Source : Daily Mail
19Dec/110

Not such hidden treasure: Owner dies in poverty while Renaissance ‘bric-a-brac’ worth £147,000 sits on his shelf for 30 years

A bronze statue of the Greek god Zeus dismissed as interesting 'bric-a-brac' on a shelf for 30 years turned out to be a Renaissance classic worth AUS$225,150 (£147,000).

Australian Denis Warrington-Fry bought the 25in high figure in the 1970s for less than AUS$200.

Unbeknown to him the statue was in fact a genuine piece of work by a Renaissance artist.

The figure's true value only came to light after Mr Warrington-Fry died aged 80 and his estate sold at auction.

An anonymous buyer from London splashed out the staggering sum for the statue on Sunday.

It has not been confirmed who created the work but it is rumoured to be a famous European artist.

Mr Warrington-Fry picked up the statue from an antique shop in Sydney, Australia.

Tragically, his house fell into disrepair and he struggled to pay the bills unaware he had a valuable statue on the mantelpiece.

Friend Geoff Northausen said: 'It's hard to imagine what he might have done with the money had he known the figurine was worth this much.'

The statue was sold by auctioneers Vickers and Hoad in Sydney.

Director Colin Vickers said: 'When we finished bidding there was a bit of applause and everyone was in shock - I needed to take a drink of water and compose myself.'

Source : Daily Mail
15Dec/110

Now that’s cash in the attic: Shocked family discover neglected statue is worth £12.2million

A statue left languishing as ‘just part of the furniture’ by its owners has been sold at auction for £12.2million.

The 4ft 5in marble depiction of Leda and the Swan had been in the family of the Marquess of Zetland for more than 200 years – and may even have spent some time as a garden ornament.

But no one thought to have it valued until it was spotted by an antiquities specialist at the family seat of Aske Hall, North Yorkshire.

He found it dated to second century Imperial Rome, and estimated its value at £1.2million. But when it was finally sold in New York it prompted a bidding war and went for ten times that.

A source at the hall said: 'The family knew it was old and that it was Roman but they had no idea of its true value.'

So unaware of the statue's pedigree was the Marquess and his family that it spent decades outside masquerading as a garden ornament before it was finally taken inside for good around 40 years ago.

The sculpture was one of four antiquities bought in Rome by the 1st Earl on behalf of his father.

It does not appear in any of the major surveys of ancient marble sculpture in English country houses, but is mentioned in Robinson’s Guide to Richmond of 1833.

Aske Hall has an impressive collection of historic furniture, paintings and porcelain.

The most prized of the ancient antiquities bought in Rome by the 1st Earl - a statue of the Lysippean Eros - was stolen. It was taken from the grounds of Aske Hall in the 1970s and has never been recovered.

The sculpture was offered for auction by the will trust of the 3rd Marquess of Zetland, Lawrence Dundas, who was chairman of Catterick and Redcar racecourses and died in 1989.

Grand: Aske Hall is owned by the Marquess Of Zetland, who only found out that the sculpture dated back to the 2nd Century after an antiquities expert made a routine visit to the estate

Source : Daily Mail
UK Auctioneers
12Dec/110

Thomas Watson Auctioneers successful Winter Antique Sale

Thomas Watson Auctioneers based in Northumberland Street, Darlington held a highly successful Winter Antique Sale on Tuesday, 29th November with some very good prices achieved.

The highlight of the sale was a Victorian Silver Gilt 'Warwick Vase' by Walter and John Barnard, London 1891 which sold after furious bidding over the telephone and internet to a collector in South Africa for £11,000.

‘Warwick Vase’ Sold for £11,000

With the prices of precious metals still at high, jewellery was also a big seller with an 18ct Gold Bracelet selling for £1,500 and another 9ct Bracelet that sold for £1,150.

A rather unusual item, a Millefiori Glass Newel Post Finial, made quite a stir in the saleroom, with a modest estimate of £60-£100, two bidders fought over it and eventually settled at a selling price of £1,600.

All results can be viewed on the website www.thomaswatson.com. & UKAuctioneers.com